Ethical Dilemmas In Book My Sisters Keeper - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1776 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2019/05/18 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Ethical Dilemma Essay Did you like this example? ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN MY SISTERS KEEPER My sisters keeper is a novel written by Jodi Picoult first published in 2004. It is a story about a family almost torn apart by illness of one daughter and the intended medical emancipation of another daughter who is tired of being a donor to her sick sister. This book therefore presents several ethical dilemmas. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Ethical Dilemmas In Book My Sisters Keeper" essay for you Create order It presents to the reader to distinguish between what is wrong or right or what is legal or not. It is about un endless love a mother has for her child and what lengths she would go to save her dying daughter. Was it ethical for the doctor to suggest genetically engineering a baby for the purpose of donating? Critics of genetic engineering do not support it because they feel like this is playing God. They believe it is morally impermissible to interfere with human nature.Many people believe it is unethical to create embryos and then destroy them in order to harvest the stem cells. As for Sarahs case, they had to destroy embryos that were not a genetic match to Kate ad only implant that which was a perfect match. Human rights activists believe embryos are human beings and as such have the full moral right of an individual, and therefore they feel like destroying incompatible embryos as murder. Looking at the moral framework, ethicists believe that it is morally justified to genetically engineer a child if the intention was good. As seen in the case of Anna, the intention was to save her sister Kate who is dying of leukaemia and thus the intention was good. Drawing back to the utilitarianism theory, Anna was genetically engineered to save her sister so that she can in the end provide happiness to the greater majority that is her parents, her brother and her dying sister. Was it ethical for Sarah and Brian to conceive a child(Anna) for the purpose of saving another childs life(Kate)? Most people have a child without thinking about why. People who are in support of having a child for the sole purpose of organ donation will argue that if a woman can have a child with no particular reason but as a result probably a fun night coupled with alcohol intoxication, then why not have a child with a purpose of saving another in the notion of altruism. People who are against the notion of having a child for the sole purpose will argue that this is against the notion that people are to be treated as an end and never merely as a means to an end. When Sarah and Brian decided to have Anna for the sole purpose of organ donation, it seems that the Fitzgeralds were using Anna as a means to an end which raises an ethical issue. Was it ethical for the parents to force Anna to donate to her dying sister? Anna being a live donor to Kate violates the traditional rule of medicine that is primum non nocere (above all, do no harm) because it involves the removal of a healthy organ from one person for implantation into another person. The pain Anna had to go through while they harvested lymphocytes, bone marrow and other cell types clearly showed Anna was being subjected to harm and so some people will argue that it is only morally right and ethical to harvest tissues and organs from a donor who is already dead to avoid causing harm to them. Anna being a child below 13 years of age, her parents had to consent for her to be organ/ tissue donor but the ethical dilemma here is, can we really know if the decisions made by Sarah and Brian to let Anna donate was in the best interest of Anna or not or they did it for their own benefit or for Kates benefit. Anna was less than two years when she started donating tissues and cells to her sister. Her parents were consenting for her but still this goes against her autonomy, the right of self-determination.Even though she is young, at 13 she can either decline or accept any medical procedure to be performed on her and so it is seen as though her parents were going against her autonomy to choose what she would want to be done to her body by trying to force her to donate a kidney to her sister Kate. Even if Anna was to willingly donate to her sister Kate, we cannot determine if her willingness was not out of coercion and out of being the feeling of being trapped because if she did not do as her mother wished, it would jeopardise her relationship with her mother. Many hospitals and doctors believe that there is a conflict when a parent consents to an organ donation between two siblings, because it is hard for the parents to be impartial and make the best decision for the donor child(Mathew,2008). The critics argue that the parents are so concerned with the sick child that they are willing to sacrifice a well-child to get the sick child better. Opponents of minor sibling donations believe that the long term effects of a child donating an organ to another is never taken as of great importance. They believe that there is a chance that the donor sibling might need the donated tissue or organ for their own use and it will not be available to them later in life because of a decision to donate made by their parents when they were younger(Mathews,2008). In Annas case, if she donated a kidney to Kate, she may never be able to play soccer and do all the other things she had always wanted to do in life. Even though some critics believe that the parents are not in the best position to consent to sibling donors, courts have consistently allowed parents to make decisions concerning sibling donors. Lastly but not least, Kate was terminally ill and even if Anna was to give her a kidney, her chances of surviving was still very minimal and so we ask, was it really beneficial to let Anna loose a kidney to a dying person who will never recover anyway? What is the cost verses the benefit? Secondly what would the consequences be if Anna donated to her sister or not. What would the consequences be to Anna, Kate, her parents and family at large? Supporters of child organ donors believe if a sibling donated an organ to another and saved their lives, this will bring psychological satisfaction and more happiness to both the donor and her family as well. Basing on the concept of beneficence, Anna donating tissues and organs to her sister was a pure act of beneficence that is the act of showing mercy, kindness and charity for the love of humanity. Was it ethical for Sarah to keep Kate alive against her will? Kate wanted to die, she was tired of being sick and having all these medical procedures performed on her and so she asked her donor, Anna to stop donating to her. The challenge was their mother Sarah would not accept this decision by Kate and thus Kate and Anna came up with a plan to sue her parents for medical emancipation. John Stuart Mill advanced the principle that ?the only purpose for which power can be rightly exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. A terminally ill person is not harming anyone in the society and so why not let them exercise their will to withdraw treatment or refuse treatment and die just like in Kates scenario. To deny terminally ill patients the right to deny treatment and thus quicken death is to condemn them to a miserable existence, contrary to their wishes. Issues as personal as ones own life and death are very personal decisions that an individual should make and to deny someone this decision is go against a persons autonomy and democracy and thus Sarah should have respected Kates decision to die. For Sarah, it was hard for her to allow her daughter Kate to die without her intervening. She felt it was her duty as a mother to keep her daughter alive using all means possible (deontology). Nothing was going to come her way to stop her from keeping Kate alive. Was it ethical for Sarah and Brian to switch off the life support machine for Anna? People against life support point to situations where it is clear that there are no chances of recovery and life support only prolongs the dying process. that it is morally wrong to keep someone alive without their consent, possibly prolonging their suffering. This group compared the cost verses the benefit of keeping someone on life support and cost outweighed the benefit. This group will argue that it morally justifiable and ethical for Annas parents to turn off the life support machine since she was already declared brain dead.The other group of people who are in support of life support say that it is morally wrong to let someone die, that no one has a right to take a life and so turning off life support machine is violating the right to life. CONCLUSION My Sisters Keeper examines what it means to be a good parent, a good sister, a good person. Sarah felt like whatever she did to save Kates life was morally right even if it meant putting Annas life at risk and causing harm to Anna. Anna knew her purpose in life was to save her sister Kate but when Kate asked her to stop donating, she respected her sisters wish and thus fought for medical emancipation from her parents, to her she felt this was the right thing to do. Kate was dying of renal failure but she did not want to have her sisters kidney, she was tired of living and undergoing lots of treatments and procedure and so when she asked her sister to let her, would it be wrong or right to grant her wishes? This book presents you with a lot of ethical dilemmas that you would only find right answers to by applying ethical theories and principles. Depending on the different situations being presented in the book and with the application of the different theories of ethics, I would either agree or disagree with the authors position. REFERENCES https://www.smatthewliao.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/liaoselectchildren.pdf https://www.nytimes.com/1991/06/04/health/more-babies-being https://www.academia.edu/4736885/The_Ethics_on_Genetically_Engineering_Bg-born https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4646954/

William Faulkner s A Rose For Emily And A Barn Burning

This paper will be focusing on several of the symbols in two different stories from the author William Faulkner. These two stories are A Rose for Emily and a Barn Burning. Faulkner s short stories are known to be teeming with symbolism, however, this paper will be covering six of the most compelling symbols. The symbols found in Rose for Emily are the house, the corpse, and the rose. In Barn Burning, the wagon, rug and blood will be discussed. The first symbol, found in A Rose for Emily, is the house where Emily and her father live. This house is at one time a beautiful home to Emily and her father. During that time, the house symbolizes prosperity, family, and happiness. Unfortunately, the house does not stay a positive symbol forever. Emily s father dies and the only people that continue to live in the house is Emily and one servant. Emily does not take care of her beautiful home any longer. The house is no longer appealing. It slowly becomes rundown and is symbol of despair an d grief. Emily uses the house to alienate herself from the rest of society. She comes out of her alienation when she meets a man that she likes. His name is Homer Barron and she dreams of one day sharing her home with him. However, Homer does not agree with the ideas of Emily and tries to leave her. Emily is not fond of his choice to flee her, so she murders him. She uses the house to hold him like a trophy in a room. The house that was thought of as a positive place in theShow MoreRelatedWilliam Faulkner s A Rose For Emily And Barn Burning863 Words   |  4 Pagesprevious traditions relevancy. William Faulkner, author of stories: â€Å"A Rose for Emily† and â€Å"Barn Burning† represent the processes of perception through the struggle between traditions and personal values. William Faulkner s two short stories, â€Å"A Rose for Emily† and â€Å"Barn Burning†, share similar structure plots of these two different stories, sharing a relatable theme on the effects of a father’s teaching and the impact it has on their children. The protagonists Miss Emily and Sarty are shown makingRead MoreWilliam Faulkner s A Rose For Emily And Barn Burning796 Words   |  4 PagesWilliam Faulkner has said that when you are writing a novel, there is a lot of room to add some fluff and be a bit careless with your ideas, but when writing a short story there is no room for â€Å"trash†, as he calls it. However, this can be a tough thing to do when you have a lot to say. Even Faulkner could have difficulty following along with his beliefs. After having read and considered A Rose for Emily and Barn Burning, I do believe that William Faulkner has been true to his beliefs in both of theseRead More William Faulkners A Rose for Emily and Barn Burning Ess ay1106 Words   |  5 PagesSymbolism in William Faulkners A Rose for Emily and Barn Burning If we compare William Faulkners two short stories, A Rose for Emily and Barn Burning, he structures the plots of these two stories differently. However, both of the stories note the effect of a father ¡Ã‚ ¦s teaching, and in both the protagonists Miss Emily and Sarty make their own decisions about their lives. The stories present major ideaRead MoreWilliam Faulkner s A Rose For Emily1801 Words   |  8 Pages William Faulkner is known for his many short stories, however, many has wondered what has influenced him in writing these stories. Like his well known, most famous short story â€Å"A Rose for Emily†, which has always been compared to â€Å"Barn Burning†, one of Faulkner’s other short story. It only make sense to compare them two together because these two stories has may similarities , whether it may be in setting , characters or style they favor each other . Nevertheless they also have many differencesRead MoreWilliam Faulkner s A Rose For Emily1810 Words   |  8 Pages William Faulkner is one amazing writing ,who is known for his many short stories .However, many has wondered what has influenced him in writing these stories . Like his well known, most famous short story â€Å"A Rose for Emily†, which has always been compared to â€Å"Barn Burning†, one of Faulkner’s other short story. It only make sense to compare them two together because these two stories has may similarities , whether it may be in setting , characters or style they favor each other . NeverthelessRead MoreWilliam Faulkner’s Barn Burning and A Rose for Emily Essay1157 Words   |  5 Pages â€Å"Barn Burning† is a story filled with myth. This coming of age story features a boy stuck in a family with a father who can be thought of as Satan, and can be easily seen as connected to myths of Zeus and Cronus. The connection to Zeus is further elaborated when William Faulkner’s â€Å"A Rose for Emily† is also con sidered. These two stories along with a few others provided an amazing view of the south. Many characters or families can be viewed as groups that lived in the south duringRead MoreWilliam Faulkner s Literary Accomplishments1753 Words   |  8 PagesWilliam Faulkner was a powerful writer whose highly anthologized works bear the image of the Southern Gothic tradition and the weight of more than half a century of literary analysis and criticism. Despite a vast amount of intense and perhaps belated scrutiny directed at Faulkner s literary accomplishments, the author himself had a vision and scope not to be outdone by his commentators. Between 1929 and 1936, Faulkner published novels with characters ranging from children, thinkers, the insane,Read More William Faulkner Essay1234 Words   |  5 Pages Faulkner grew up in Mississippi in the beginning of the twentieth century (William Faulkner; 699). He was the son to Murray C. and Maud Butler Faulkner (Hoffman 13). Growing up in the South in the early 1900s meant being exposed to harsh racism. He watched the blacks endure unbelievable amounts of cruelty and was amazed at how the blacks conducted themselves with such dignity. He witnessed, first hand, what discrimination is and could not comprehend why this goes on. In many of Faulkners worksRead MoreA Rose For Emily And Barn Burning By William Faulkner1049 Words   |  5 Pages In A Rose for Emily and Barn Burning, William Faulkner creates two characters worthy of comparison. Emily Grierson, a recluse from Jefferson, Mississippi, is an important figure in the town, despite spending most of her life in seclusion. On the contrary, Abner Snopes is a loud, fiery-tempered man that most people tend to avoid. If these characters are judged by reputation and outward appearance only, the conclusion would be that Emily Grierson and Abner Snopes are complete opposites. HoweverRead MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 Pagesspeakers. In 1840, in his introduction to The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, William Whewell wrote: We very much need a name to describe a cultivator of science in general. I propose to call him a scientist. Whewells stipulative definition caught on. It has now become a correct lexical definition. Persuasive definitions are another category of definitions. Take the definition of atheist proposed by William, an acquaintance of mine: By atheist I mean a non-Christian pervert who will rot

12 Principles Free Essays

There are 12 basic principles to Information Security. The first principle is that there is no such thing as absolute security. What this means is that with the correct tolls, skills and time anyone can hack into a system. We will write a custom essay sample on 12 Principles or any similar topic only for you Order Now The second principle are the three security goals, which are C. I. A; Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability. What this means is that everyone must consider what data they want to be protected.It also means that one must be sure as to whom they want to access this information and when they should access this information. The third principle is when a company is protecting their data with armed guards, cameras, safes and secured passwords. This principle is called Defense In Depth. The fourth principle is when people are left alone they tend to make the worst decisions. Function and Requirements is the fifth principle for information security.Function details what the system should be doing and the assurance requirements describe how the functions should be implemented. The following two questions should be asked when this principle comes into play; does the system do the right thing? Does the system do the right things and in the right way. The sixth principle is that Security through Obscurity is Not an Answer. This principle simply means that if you believe that hiding information can prevent hackers from hacking into your system then you are mistaken.By misleading anyone into a sense of false security is more detrimental than anything. Risk Management is the seventh principle. Its’ simple to understand this principle, what is the consequence of this loss and would this loss occur again. The eight principles are preventative, detective and responsive controls. Take the steps to detect the threat, prevent it and lastly respond while the threat is occurring or after. What this means is that it will detect the threat, try to prevent the threat from happening.Complexity is The Enemy of Security is the ninth principle, this means that the more interfacing with programs the more difficult it becomes to protect the data. The tenth principle is that fear, uncertainty and doubt do not when trying to use scare tactics when selling products for security. No one will by products if they feel they are extremely scared. Now a days companies want to know what they are purchasing and why they should be so fearful. The eleventh principle is that people, process, and technology are all needed to adequately secure a system or facility.This means that in order for everything to work correctly we should not base all operation solely off of technology but on the people in takes to run and process the information. This process helps to ensure that everything runs smoothly. The last principle is Open disclosures of Vulnerabilities is Good for Security, which means that by letting everyone know what can be hacked into can let the companies know what measures need to be taken to ensure that it does not happen again. If it were closed off to the world then problems that arise would never be fixed or maintained. How to cite 12 Principles, Papers

Eliezer Wiesels Night Essay Example For Students

Eliezer Wiesels Night Essay Eliezer Wiesels NightThe Book Night was the autobiography of Eliezer Wiesel. This was ahorrible and sobering tale of his life story. The story takes place inSighet, Translyvania. Its the year 1941 and World War II is occurring. Eliezer was 12 at this time and wasnt really aware of what was occurringin the world concerning the Jewish people. He had a friend who went by thename Moshe the Beadle. Moshe was very good friend of Elezers. One day it was ordered that all foreign Jews in Sighet be deported byGerman troops. They were told they had to wear yellow stars to identifythemselves. Eliezers friends Moshe was also a foreign Jew, which meant hehad to be deported. Eliezer did not see his friend Moshe for months. Whenhe finally saw him, Moshe was weeping. Eliezer asked him what was wrong. Moshe told him he was in a concentration camp. He said they threw him in apit and shot his leg, but he managed to escape to worn him to flee for hislife. Eliezer didnt listen to him anyway. About three days later, German troops entered Sighet. They order thepeople of Sighet to surrender to them or die. The people surrendered andhad to give up all their possessions. Moshe was right, it did happen. Allthe people of Sighet were jammed into train cars and shipped to theconcentration camp of Aushcwitz. At that point Eliezer was separated fromhis family forever with the exception of his father. There was a largecrematory in Aushcwitz. You could smell the burning flesh in the air. Eliezer was ordered to the crematory. He came within two paces of it, butthen was ordered to the barracks. He was saved for that night only. Afterthat incident, he lived with fear of when was he going to die. Eliezer later went to other concentration camps in Bakenau and Buna. During these years in the camps he lived through great suffering. Starvation, and survival. He also witnesses thousands of people die andmurdered including his own father. Eliezer was finally shipped toBuchenwald. Which would end up being his last stay at any concentrationcamp. It was now the year 1945 and this ordeal was finally over. Alliedforces had defeated the German troops and the people who survived werefree. The first chance Eliezer had he wanted to look in a mirror. When hefinally got the chance he didnt see the same person he once was. He hadthe look of a dead corpse in his eyes, and that look is with him for therest of his life. I think the conflict that Eliezer had was not only physical but mentalalso. It was a conflict within himself to survive. In the end, heovercome it because he did survive this ordeal. In conclusion, I think Night was very detailed book. It made merealize the horror of the Holocaust and we must never allow this happenagain. Thats the message that Elie Wiiesel wanted to spread. If otherpeople were to read this book, I think they would be moved the way I wasand realize his message.